Tayari's Blog: BOOKS ABOUT OTHER BOOKS
Posted by TayariJones on July 20, 2005 10:37 AM
Filed under
Bookshelf
I am finally reading THE WIND DONE GONE by Alice Randall. You probably remember the drama a couple of years ago. (Check out the 209 reviews on Amazon!)This is the novel written from the point of view of the illigitmate BLACK sister of Scarlett O'Hara, who happens the be the concubine of one Mr. Rhett Butler.... The novel is intriguing, but I have a philosophical issue bugging me as I read it.
Okay, here's what's on my mind. Women writers and writers of color often write novels that revise the so-called "classics." Take THE WIND DONE GONE. Randall is obvious reacting to America's Love Affair with Gone With The Wind. There are other examples: Jean Rhys's WIDE SARGASSO SEA which is from the point of view of JANE EYRE'S infamous "madwoman in the attic." I could go on and on. Oh, one more. MY JIM, which is about the wife of Huck Finn's faithful Negro, Jim.
Here's my worry. What does is mean that so many maginalized writers are writing books that almost REQUIRE that a person read a "so-called" classic? I know it is meant as an act of resistance, I believe that it is effective, but what does is mean to construct a literary tradition that is in reaction to another text, one that the author finds offensive?
I often read criticism of texts by marginalized writers which contextualize that writer in terms of a more mainstream writer. I am thinking of Ann Petry's masterpiece, THE STREET, which is often described as a "woman's NATIVE SON." I never see white male writers described in the context of being a "white version" of a person of color's work.
So, I guess I am saying that I am really ambivalent about the project of THE WIND DONE GONE. Being from Atlanta, I understand why she took it on and I must admit that I reacted with something like glee when the Margaret Mitchell House was so pissed off about the book and tried to stop its publication. But, still, I am uneasy.
There is another novel, PROPERTY, by Valerie Martin. This novel is from the point of view of a white slave-owning woman. It does not reference Gone With The Wind or any of it's characters. Nevertheless, I believe it does more to undermine the myth of Tara than any other work of fiction I have ever read. After reading that novel, I will never quite look at slavery in the same way. Martin examines the uneasy position of white woman in the ante bellum south-- themselves almost property of their husbands while still able to inflict great cruelty and power of the African men and women under thier control. It is, quite simply, a masterpiece.
![[divider]](http://www.tayarijones.com/images/divider.jpg)
There are 4 comments on "BOOKS ABOUT OTHER BOOKS". If you'd like to leave a comment, click here to jump down to the comments entry form.
Comment #1, by Fred Joiner
wow, I never thought of these works in the context or being "reactionary", that was quite a perceptive turn. I agree that we should be concerned about building a tradition in this way. iwll definitely check the other books you mentioned. thanks for this entry. Peace
July 20, 2005 11:18 AM
Comment #2, by Judy Dozier
You make a very important observation. Needed to be said. As resistant as these sorts of novels appear to be, they may actually perpetuate the abhorrent in these classics. Haven't read Property; plan to on your recommendation.
July 20, 2005 03:18 PM
Comment #3, by Karama Neal
I read "Property" after you recommended it at your Atlanta Public Library reading. I understand what you mean. Thanks for the suggestion.
July 20, 2005 07:42 PM
Comment #4, by Teen
I would go for publishing a series of white papers. This tactic works wonderfully.
October 21, 2005 11:35 PM